The utilitarianism of an act is a moral principle that evaluates the action in a particular situation for the immediate consequences to which it leads. The move to rule utilitarianism, though, may appear ad hoc, or a concession to irrational ruleworship. Difference between act and rule utilitarianism free essays. The directindirect distinction could be used synonymously with the distinction between act and rule utilitarianism. This highly opposed by the rule utilitarianism as the rule dictates that one should instead an individual should follow the rule that has the best consequences if observed at a general level. But the presence of these other functional possibilities of the utility principle demonstrates that the utilitarian has many more options than simple act and rule utilitarianism. Utilitarianism, act and rule internet encyclopedia of. In act utilitarianism, the consequence determines whether the act is good or bad whereas, in rule utilitarianism, the act is construed either good or bad depending on the result of the rules agreed upon.
Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people, while rule utilitarianism is the belief that the moral correctness of an action depends on the correctness of the rules that allows it to achieve the greatest good. Utilitarianism 1863 by john stuart mill chapter two. Act and rule utilitarianism normative ethics normative ethics now were on to the second major portion of our class normative ethics. The notion of rule utilitarianism has been discussed under two main headings. This paper is a brief philosophical exploration into act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
If the general observance of this rule were optimific compared to the general observance of another rule. The distinction has to do with what the principle of utility is applied to according to the act utilitarian auian, the principle is applied directly to the selection of particular actions under particular circumstances. However rule utilitarianism aims to dispose the problem presented by act utilitarianism, which is aiming for the rule that will produce the best consequences. Mill relies on rules more, and is sometimes known as a rule utilitarian. As time has passed, however, the term has evolved to the point where utilitarianism has become an umbrella term for multiple theories that. Action according to kantianism, action should be motivated by goodwill and duty and the morality of an action is not measured by its consequences. Rule tells us our conduct ought to be guided by societys guidelines on morality. Under act utilitarianism, the morality is on the effect of a good action that benefits most people whereas, in rule utilitarianism, the morality is on following a certain rule or code of conduct when doing an action that has benefits to most people. Rule utilitarianism is based on the same hedonist basis as act utilitarianism, that is to say that they are both formed on the basis that pleasure or happiness is the sole intrinsic good, and the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain determine our moral decisions.
Based on the definitions given by wikipedia, rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism both seems to imply the same meaning rule utilitarianism. People dont really talk about anything called traditional utilitarianism. An example of act utilitarianism is stopping at a red light. Act utilitarianism inclines more towards the person or group of persons that benefit most by the act unlike in the case of rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is the theory that a persons act is morally right if and only if it produces at least as much happiness as any other act the person could perform at that time. Act utilitarianism chapter 6 the cambridge companion to. What is the differences between rule utilitarianism vs act. It argues that when determining the correctness of an action, a person has to take into account and evaluate the consequences of actions. Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says an action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance.
Act utilitarianism is arguably the more natural, or. What is the difference in the rules of act and rule. Conversely, some utilitarians measure a laws usefulness by its ability to decrease. Philosophers richard brandt and brad hooker are major proponents of such an approach. Action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance. Such an interpretation is what has been called actutilitarianism, in contrast to ruleutilitarianism or other more complex versions of utilitarianism. First of all a rule has to be developed and the action follows the rule. The rules of conduct that we follow in society are part of rule utilitarianism. Dealing with rules, as abstractions without specific individuals and chaotic factors, make it a. Article pdf available in journal of moral philosophy 52. What is the difference between kantianism and utilitarianism. It s that our duty on any occasion isto act in the way which will produce actual overall consequences better than or at least as good as those that any other act open to us would produce. Act utilitarianism is concerned with the consequences of the act whereas rule utilitarianism is based on the rules of conduct. So this rule utilitarianism instead of act utilitarianism distinction was proposed.
In contrast, act utilitarians judge an act in terms of the consequences of that act alone. The main difference between kantianism and utilitarianism is that kantianism is a deontological theory while utilitarianism is a teleological theory. Therefore, bentham is an act utilitarian as the hedonic calculus must be applied to each individual act. Ruleutilitarianism 227 ii actutilitarianism has a number of strengths. Strengths and weaknesses of act utilitarianism flashcards. An act is right if and only if it would be permitted by a system of. I will also explore a third option which attempts to find a solution to the problems both approaches face. What is the difference between act and rule utilitarianism. Act would entail one act and the resulting consequence. Act and rule utilitarianism introduction to ethics. Does ruleutilitarianism collapse into act utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism sees the consequence of an action in itself as one act whereas rule utilitarianism sees the consequences as if it will be repeated all over again for the long term. Smart 1967 rule utilitarianism states that our duty is not to aim for that act which will. Rule utilitarianism applies principle of utility to moral rules.
Other articles where act utilitarianism is discussed. Rule utilitarianism, on the other hand, is more concerned with rules. Utilitarianism, act and rule internet encyclopedia of philosophy. It allows for the abuse of peoples rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it. Utilitarianism7 as well as truth and falsehood, are questions of observation and experience.
The two concepts of act and rule utilitarianism were first conceived by jeremy bentham and john stuart mill. Act utilitarianism first looks into the consequences of an act. These two forms of utilitarianism differ from each other. The justification of action for the above rule mentioned are about the greater good of the society, how are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism different from each other. Bentham is sometimes referred to as an act utilitarian because in his view each time you need to consider each act individually. First, it is significant that mill departed from the principle of utility on occasion. Distinguishing between act utilitarianism and rule. The supposed difference between rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism states that the best act is whichever act would yield the most happiness.
Utilitarianism act and rule utilitarianism gradesaver. Normative ethics is the study of what we ought to do, or what we owe to each other. More specifically, the only effects of actions that are relevant are the good and bad results that they produce. This article focuses on perhaps the most important dividing line among utilitarians, the clash between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. General remarks little progress has been made towards deciding the controversy concerning the criterion of right and wrong. Ethics is a field of study that will almost always seem very complicated for any beginner. Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. The one with the better consequence is most likely the good choice. The main differences between act and rule utilitarianism. But both hold equally that morality must be deduced from prin. The differences between rule and act utilitarianism are as follows. Although utilitarians differ as to the meaning of the word useful, most agree that a laws utility may be defined as its ability to increase happiness, wealth, or justice.
Rule utilitarianism legal definition of rule utilitarianism. Act in such a way that the rule on which you act could be adopted as a law by all rational beings. What is the difference between rule utilitarianism and act. Rule utilitarianism instead states that the best act is to follow the general rule which would yield the most happiness. Act utilitarianism is resultoriented in purpose whereas rule utilitarianism is focused on being in line with the rules. The more common parlance is classical utilitarianism, which is basically the work of jeremy bentham. Recall that metaethics is \meta, a step above, and is about ethical discourse e. It tells us to choose the rule we think will produce. It deals with acts that are either good or bad and right or wrong. Act utilitarianism is the application of utilitarianism on a casebycase basis. Act utilitarianism is the belief that it is alright to break a rule as long as it brings a greater good, while rule utilitarianism is a belief that even if a rule cannot bring a greater good, breaking it will not either. The two kinds are extensionally equivalent and the only stable rule available to the ruleutilitarian is the actutilitarian one, e.
For example, with act utilitarianism, if we had to approach assisted suicide, we would approach each individual case where assisted suicide was being considered, and determine in each case whether or not the act of assisting suicide would result in the greatest. Combining the theses of welfarism and sumranking yields the view that the. Utilitarianism has remained influential and vibrant within ethical canon since mills treatise was first published in 1861. Start studying strengths and weaknesses of act utilitarianism. Act tells us to look first at the consequences of our actions and break societys laws if it seems morally correct.
Instead of applying the theory to a real world act, apply it to an ideal rule. This paper is a brief philosophical exploration into act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, both of which are two different approaches within the ethical theory of utilitarianism. An actutilitarian might argue in response to this that actutilitarianism is a not a decisions procedure guide but a judgement of what is right and wrong, but even still that would seem to give ruleutilitarianism the upper hand as it appears to provide both a decisions procedure and a. Is ruleutilitarianism preferable to actutilitarianism. They both followed the basic principles of utilitarianism, which focuses on the pursuit of happiness, which is the morally good principle to follow. Act utilitarianism article about act utilitarianism by. It is relatively easy to understand and apply, has been championed by normative ethicists for over a century, and is intuitively plausible. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with act utilitarianism ersus rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. Act vs rule utilitarianism basic definitions act utilitarianism is the most basic form of utilitarianism. This dissertation addresses the question of whether actutilitarianism au can provide practical. However some scholars are uncomfortable with this as mill advocated following general rules that could be broken. A plausible formulation of ruleutilitarianism would thus have it recommend the same actions as actutilitarianism. One reason for doubting that ruian reasoning can help with the test cases is that in two different ways, people have argued that ruians and auians should reach exactly the same judgements about all possible cases so that if the auian judges the test cases a certain way, then so should the ruian. The major difference between act and rule utilitarianism is the means of judgement in terms of the best possible outcomes for specific situations.
It involves various theories that are grounded on principles on doing certain acts. Just as rule utilitarianism focuses on the standard scenario of making standard moral codes, act utilitarianism states that it is important to make decisions in each individual. By far, rule and act utilitarianism, are the mostdiscussed in the literature. Rule utilitarianism this form of utilitarianism argues that you should focus on general rules that everyone should follow to bring out the greatest good. What utilitarianism is the creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Act and rule utilitarianism essay sample throughout this essay i will be comparing the act and rule variations of utilitarianism to uncover the difference between the two. Pdf two concepts of rule utilitarianism researchgate.
For this reason au has also been called direct utilitarianism. Explain the difference between rule, act and preference utilitarianism 25 marks utilitarianism is the ethical theory behind justifying an action for being for the greater good this is a teleological theory because it looks at the consequences of an action. Like other forms of consequentialism, its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. Utilitarianism is teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which argues that something is good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of the people. Without going into the history of the debate, the short answer is rule utilitarianism lodges the utility judgment in a rule, or set of rules that cover a course of action in general, and from perception, to decision, to action, and, very important. Rule utilitarianism contends that an action can be morally right if it in the end provides the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest. The two conflicting sides of this theory are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. For rule utilitarians, the correctness of a rule is determined by the amount of good it brings about when followed. In jurisprudence, a philosophy whose adherents believe that law must be made to conform to its most socially useful purpose. One ought to do that action that maximizes happiness in a particular situation for the people affected by the action the ethical question. In this case subrules should be added that can handle such cases.
97 266 991 111 15 436 1272 476 1330 1239 1096 1478 1410 739 554 523 1264 893 1274 1228 1038 652 808 26 1446 469 149 401 850 808 252 1101 481 1495 257 179 609 1407